Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Three whooping cough baby deaths

Written By Unknown on Jumat, 30 November 2012 | 16.50

29 November 2012 Last updated at 19:03 ET

Three babies died from whooping cough in October as one of the worst outbreaks of the disease in decades continues, Health Protection Agency figures for England and Wales show.

It brings the number of deaths in newborns, who are most at risk of fatal complications, to 13 this year.

There were 1,614 infections last month, bringing the total to 7,728 this year.

A UK-wide campaign to vaccinate pregnant women, to pass protection on to their children, is under way.

There are surges in whooping cough cases every three to four years. However, the current outbreak has affected nearly 10 times as many people as the previous outbreak in 2008.

There have been more than 1,600 cases reported in Scotland and around 200 cases in Northern Ireland, but no deaths.

Immune system
Continue reading the main story
  • It is also known as pertussis and is caused by a species of bacteria, Bordetella pertussis
  • It mostly affects infants, who are at highest risk of complications and even death
  • The earliest signs are similar to a common cold, which then develop into a cough and can even result in pneumonia
  • Babies may turn blue while coughing due to a lack of oxygen
  • The cough tends to come in short bursts followed by desperate gasps for air (the whooping noise)
  • Adults can be infected - but the infection often goes unrecognised

The infection can stop a baby breathing or lead to pneumonia, brain damage, weight loss and death.

Newborns are most vulnerable as they are too young to be vaccinated - doses are given at two, three and four months of age.

Pregnant women, between 28 and 38 weeks, are now being offered a whooping cough vaccine. It should prompt the mother's immune system to create more antibodies to attack the whooping cough bacterium. The antibodies should pass from the mother to the child in the womb and offer protection when a baby is born.

In August, there were 72 infections in children under one. That fell to 67 when the vaccination programme started in September and fell again to 46 in October. However, it is too soon to tell if vaccination is making a difference.

Dr Gayatri Amirthalingam, consultant epidemiologist for immunisation at the HPA, said: "The October figures show a continuing rise in the overall number of whooping cough cases.

"While there has been a decline in the number of infant cases it's important to emphasise that it's too early to see any impact from the pregnancy vaccination programme.

"We strongly recommend all pregnant women take up the offer of vaccination."

Routine vaccination was introduced in 1957. Before then cases could affect more than 100,000 people and kill 300 in a single year.

Health experts do not know why the outbreak is so large this year, especially as vaccination for whooping cough is at record levels.

One theory is that the bacterium that causes the infection, Bordetella pertussis, has mutated.

Another idea is that tight control of whooping cough is part of the problem. People's immunity to whooping cough is boosted throughout life by being regularly exposed to it.

However, after years of low levels of whooping cough the whole population may have been left more vulnerable to the infection.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

No action over Griffin B&B tweet

29 November 2012 Last updated at 19:52 ET

BNP leader Nick Griffin will not face any action after he put the address of a gay couple who won a landmark court ruling on Twitter.

A court ruled Berkshire B&B owner had discriminated against Michael Black and John Morgan when she turned them away.

Mr Griffin had urged his Twitter followers to hold a demonstration following the judgement in October, but police this week dropped the case.

The Christian guest house owner has now lodged an appeal to be heard next year.

A spokesperson for Cambridgeshire Police said: "Following a police investigation and advice from the Crown Prosecution Service no criminal offences were identified."

Mr Black told BBC News the couple, who had a police presence at their home for several days, were not overly concerned about Mr Griffin's tweets.

"In the end we decided not to make a formal complaint," he added.

'Right to discriminate'

"The tweet was only up for a short time, it did not give a specific time... and nobody came."

A spokesman for the BNP said Mr Griffin had "police pounding on his door" at midnight on the night the tweets were sent.

He added: "There was obviously no offence. I think he was just figuratively speaking."

At the time Mr Griffin said people have the "right to discriminate".

Mr Black and Mr Morgan, from Brampton, Cambridgeshire, were each awarded £1,800 after Susanne Wilkinson refused to let them stay in a room with a double bed at her Cookham guest house in March 2010.

The case was heard at Reading Crown Court where Recorder Claire Moulder said Mrs Wilkinson had "treated them less favourably than she would treat unmarried heterosexual couples in the same circumstances".

However, she accepted that Mrs Wilkinson was genuine about her Christian beliefs and had also stopped unmarried heterosexual couples from sharing a double bed.

It comes as a similar case in Cornwall awaits a Supreme Court hearing.

Peter and Hazelmary Bull, the Christian owners of a guesthouse in Marazion who also turned away a gay couple, have won permission to appeal against their ruling.

Mr Black and Mr Morgan's case will be heard at the Court of Appeal between April and July next year.

Mr Black said: "I understand their barrister is trying to get [the case] dealt with early and get it put with the Cornish one at the Supreme Court.

"Of course there is the possibility of being overturned but we are pretty confident that we will win."

The Christian Institute, which is funding legal costs for both cases, said: "Religious freedom is vital to a healthy democracy, but it has been increasingly under attack in recent years.

"We support Susanne Wilkinson as she takes forward her appeal."


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Egypt assembly backs constitution

30 November 2012 Last updated at 02:56 ET

Egypt's Islamist-dominated constituent assembly has approved a draft constitution, as the judiciary threatens to dissolve it amid a power struggle with President Mohammed Morsi.

The draft will now be sent to Mr Morsi, who is expected to call a referendum.

It was approved days before the Supreme Constitutional Court rules on whether the assembly should be dissolved.

Senior judges have been in a stand-off with the president since he granted himself sweeping new powers.

An emergency decree issued last week said Mr Morsi's decisions could not be revoked by any authority, including the judiciary, until the new constitution had been ratified and fresh parliamentary elections held.

It also stated that the courts could not dissolve the constituent assembly.

The president insists the powers he has taken are meant to be temporary and will protect the transition to a constitutional democracy, but their breadth has raised fears that he might become a new strongman and triggered mass opposition protests across the country.

'Nonsensical'
Continue reading the main story
  • Sharia remains the main source of legislation
  • Egypt's most respected Islamic institution, al-Azhar, to be consulted on "matters related to sharia"
  • Christianity and Judaism to be the main source of legislation for Christians and Jews
  • Religious freedom to be limited to Muslims, Christians and Jews
  • Limits president to two four-year terms of office

The assembly backed all the 234 articles of the draft after a marathon session that began on Thursday and continued through the night.

Its aim was clearly to pre-empt any challenge by the courts, which are in a confrontation with Mr Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood which backs him, says the BBC's Jon Leyne in Cairo.

Liberal, left-wing and Christian members of the constitutional assembly boycotted the vote, accusing the Islamists of trying to impose their vision.

According to Egyptian state TV, the articles passed stipulate that Islam is the religion of the state, and the principles of Sharia, or Islamic law, are the "main source of legislation".

This is unchanged from the previous constitution under Hosni Mubarak, who was toppled as president last year.

Salafists and some members of the Muslim Brotherhood failed to have "principles" replaced by "rules".

The draft also says that Christianity and Judaism will be the "main source of legislation" for Egyptian Christians and Jews, state TV reported.

The assembly also adopted a new article that al-Azhar mosque and university, authorities on Sunni Muslim jurisprudence, must be consulted on "matters related to sharia".

The president will be limited to two four-year terms of office.

The opponents of the draft voiced concern that some clauses - such as the importance of promoting family values - could be used to restrict freedom of speech.

They also said that there was no specific article establishing equality between men and women.

Opposition figure and former Arab League chief Amr Moussa told Reuters news agency: "This is nonsensical and one of the steps that shouldn't be taken, given the background of anger and resentment to the current constitutional assembly."

Another opposition leader, Nobel Peace Prize winner Mohamed ElBaradei, said the document would be consigned to the "garbage bin of history", and would only sharpen the current divisions in Egypt.

The Supreme Constitutional Court ruling is expected on Sunday.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

UN upgrades Palestinians' status

30 November 2012 Last updated at 02:45 ET
Palestinians celebrate at UN

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

There was applause as the result of the vote was confirmed

The UN General Assembly has voted overwhelmingly to recognise Palestine as a non-member observer state - a move strongly opposed by Israel and the US.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said this was the "last chance to save the two-state solution" with Israel.

Israel's UN envoy said the bid pushed the peace process "backwards", while the US said the move was "unfortunate".

The Palestinians can now take part in UN debates and potentially join bodies like the International Criminal Court.

The assembly voted 138-9 in favour, with 41 nations abstaining.

Hundreds of Palestinians celebrated on the streets of Ramallah, in the West Bank after the result was announced.

'Birth certificate'
Continue reading the main story

Analysis

The parties began in Yasser Arafat Square on Thursday morning - long before the voting.

Mr Abbas made his speech in New York just before 23:00 local time as crowds of people waving flags gathered around large screens carrying the live feed.

Fireworks erupted in Ramallah with the news of the vote. While Palestinians will see no changes on the ground with immediate effect, the symbolism is all-important.

There is also hope that access to UN bodies will bring new rights. A successful application for membership of the International Criminal Court could be used to accuse Israel of war crimes or make other legal claims against it.

"Sixty-five years ago on this day, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution 181, which partitioned the land of historic Palestine into two states and became the birth certificate for Israel," Mr Abbas said shortly before the vote in New York.

"The General Assembly is called upon today to issue a birth certificate of the reality of the State of Palestine," he said.

But Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the vote "meaningless", and said that Mr Abbas' address in New York had not been "the words of a man who wants peace".

Opponents of the bid say a Palestinian state should emerge only out of bilateral negotiations, as set out in the 1993 Oslo peace accords under which the Palestinian Authority was established.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the vote "unfortunate and counter-productive", saying it put more obstacles on the path to peace.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon also called for more talks, saying the resolution underscored the need to resume meaningful peace negotiations.

Palestinians waving flags

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

The BBC's Aleem Maqbool said there were celebrations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip

The UK abstained from the vote, as did Germany. The Czech Republic, Canada, the Marshall Islands and Panama were among the nations voting with the US and Israel.

In the West Bank, crowds celebrated the vote by waving flags and chanting "God is great!"

"For the first time, there will be a state called Palestine, with the recognition of the entire world," Amir Hamdan was quoted as saying by the Associated Press news agency.

"Today the world will hear our voice," he added.

Symbolic milestone

The Palestinians are seeking UN recognition of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, the lands Israel captured in 1967.

While the move is seen as a symbolic milestone in Palestinian ambitions for statehood, the "Yes" vote will also have a practical diplomatic effect, says the BBC's Barbara Plett, at the UN.

Israeli ambassador to the United Nations Ron Prosor

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Israel's ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, says the only way to achieve peace is through negotiation

The Palestinians hope that access to UN bodies will bring new rights: A successful application for membership of the ICC could be used to accuse Israel of war crimes or make other legal claims against it.

"This is a whole new ball-game now. Israel will be dealing with a member of the international community, a state called Palestine with rights," senior PLO official Hanan Ashrawi told the BBC.

"We will have access to international organisations and agencies and we will take it from there."

There had been lobbying by Israel and the US to try to delay the vote or change the text to obtain guarantees that no international legal action would be taken against Israel.

Last year, Mr Abbas asked the UN Security Council to admit the Palestinians as a member state, but that was opposed by the US.

Continue reading the main story

How did key countries vote?

  • Voted for: France, Spain, Belgium, Norway, Switzerland, Austria, Denmark, Turkey, China, Russia, India, Brazil, South Africa, Nigeria
  • Voted against: Israel, US, Canada
  • Abstained: UK, Germany, Australia, Colombia

Mr Abbas was much criticised by many Palestinians for remaining on the sidelines of the conflict earlier this month in Gaza and efforts to achieve a ceasefire with Israel.

His Fatah movement, based in the West Bank, is deeply split from the militant Hamas movement which governs Gaza.

Gaza's Prime Minister Ismael Haniyeh said in a statement sent to the BBC that Hamas' "support for the UN bid is based on the 'rule of non-recognition of the occupier'... and the right of Palestinians to return to their homeland".


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Supermarkets agree to prices code

30 November 2012 Last updated at 03:54 ET

Eight supermarkets have agreed to ensure that special offers and price promotions are fair.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has been investigating the way prices are displayed, advertised and promoted in stores.

It raised concerns about prices being artificially inflated to make later discounts look more attractive.

The major UK supermarkets have now agreed to adopt a set of principles drawn up by the OFT.

They are Tesco, Sainsbury's, Morrisons, Waitrose, Marks and Spencer, Aldi, the Co-op and Lidl.

Asda, which has not yet signed up, said it was considering the revised code.

In a statement Asda argued that as it aims to keep prices for customers "as low as possible for them week in week out", a code covering special offer price promotions was not relevant.

Clive Maxwell, OFT chief executive, told the BBC: "It is particularly welcome that we've reached this agreement at this stage with household budgets under pressure".

'Squeezed finances'

The OFT says that "half price" or "was £3, now £2" offers must be sold at the new discounted price for the same, or less, time than the previously higher price.

This would prevent short-term, artificially inflated prices masking the offer.

Items that suggest they are "better value" because they are in a "bigger pack" must have a comparable product elsewhere in the same store,

"Shoppers should be able to trust that special offers and promotions really are bargains," said Mr Maxwell.

"Prices and promotions need to be fair and meaningful so shoppers can make the right decisions. Nowhere is this more important than during regular shopping for groceries.

"[This] provides supermarkets with a clear benchmark for how they should be operating so that their food and drink promotions reflect the spirit as well as the letter of the law."

'Inconsistency'

Misleading advertising is illegal under the 2008 unfair trading regulations, and the OFT is not making any recommendation that the law should be changed.

The regulator said it did not discover any illegality during its investigation, but did find some "inconsistency" in the way the law was interpreted and applied.

Studies suggest that groceries account for about 44% of household spending.

Meanwhile, nearly 40% of fast-moving consumer goods could be on some sort of promotion or discount.

Many of the supermarkets said they were happy to work with the OFT.

"We will continue to ensure that our pricing and promotions are as clear as possible for our customers," said a spokesman for Sainsbury's.

The Co-op said: "We understand how important it is for shoppers to be able to easily understand what the promotional offer is, so they can spot the best deal, and we are committed to providing clear and accurate labelling for our customers so they can make informed purchasing decisions."

Aldi said it supported any initiative that encouraged "transparent pricing and a fair deal for consumers", although the agreement would have no effect on its own prices.

A Marks and Spencer spokesman said: "It is right that we sign up to these new guidelines."

An investigation by consumer group Which? in May suggested that some customers had been misled by supermarkets over discounts and multi-buy offers.

It analysed more than 700,000 prices and suggested that in some cases "discounts" ran for much longer than the original price. Following that investigation, some supermarkets admitted isolated errors amid a huge volume of pricing.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Labour in triple by-election win

30 November 2012 Last updated at 04:23 ET
Nigel Farage

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Nigel Farage: "UKIP's issues are connecting more and more with people"

Labour has won three by-elections, holding Croydon North, Middlesbrough and Rotherham parliamentary seats.

It increased its share of the vote in all three seats, but its majority was down in Rotherham, where the previous MP had quit over expenses claims.

The UK Independence Party came second in Middlesbrough and Rotherham, and finished third in Croydon North.

In Rotherham, the Lib Dems fell from third place to eighth, behind the BNP, Respect and the English Democrats.

Labour candidate Sarah Champion won in Rotherham with 9,866 votes to UKIP candidate Jane Collins' 4,648. The BNP and the Respect Party pushed the Conservatives into fifth place, while the Lib Dems lost their deposit, trailing in eighth.

Continue reading the main story

Rotherham

  • Sarah Champion (Lab) 9,866 (46.25%, +1.62%)
  • Jane Collins (Ukip) 4,648 (21.79%, +15.87%)
  • Marlene Guest (BNP) 1,804 (8.46%, -1.96%)
  • Yvonne Ridley (Respect) 1,778 (8.34%)
  • Simon Wilson (C) 1,157 (5.42%, -11.32%)
  • David Wildgoose (Eng Dem) 703 (3.30%)
  • Simon Copley (Ind) 582 (2.73%, -3.58%)
  • Michael Beckett (LD) 451 (2.11%, -13.87%)
  • Ralph Dyson (TUSC) 261 (1.22%)
  • Paul Dickson (Ind) 51 (0.24%)
  • Clint Bristow (ND) 29 (0.14%)
  • Lab maj 5,218 (24.46%)
  • 7.13% swing Lab to UKIP

In Middlesbrough, Labour's Andy McDonald, a solicitor for a trade union law firm and former Middlesbrough councillor, won with 10,201 votes to UKIP candidate Richard Elvin's 1,990.

In Croydon North, Labour's Steve Reed - currently the leader of Lambeth Council - won 15,898 votes, beating the Conservatives' Andy Stranack by 11,761. Again polling under 5%, the Liberal Democrats lost their second deposit of the night.

The Croydon North and Middlesbrough polls were triggered by the deaths of MPs Malcolm Wicks and Sir Stuart Bell.

Ms Champion, chief executive of a children's hospice, said: "Cameron's Tories have shown what they think of Rotherham, and today this result tells David Cameron what Rotherham thinks of the Tories."

The Middlesbrough Lib Dem candidate, George Selmer, came third with 1,672 votes, or nearly 10% of the vote. Ben Houchen of the Conservative Party was in fourth place on 1,063, just three votes ahead of the Peace Party's Imdad Hussain.

Labour was odds-on at the bookmakers to retain all three seats.

Attending the Rotherham count, UKIP leader Nigel Farage said it had been a "big night" for his party.

"Our previous best-ever by-election result, a fortnight ago, was 14.3% and this one is comfortably over 20%. Whichever way you look at it, UKIP is on the rise," he said.

Continue reading the main story

Croydon North

  • Steve Reed (Lab) 15,898 (64.71%, +8.69%)
  • Andy Stranack (C) 4,137 (16.84%, -7.28%)
  • Winston McKenzie (UKIP) 1,400 (5.70%, +3.97%)
  • Marisha Ray (LD) 860 (3.50%, -10.48%)
  • Shasha Islam Khan (Green) 855 (3.48%, +1.51%)
  • Lee Jasper (Respect) 707 (2.88%, +2.35%)
  • Stephen Hammond (CPA) 192 (0.78%)
  • Richard Edmonds (NF) 161 (0.66%)
  • Ben Stevenson (Comm) 119 (0.48%, +0.17%)
  • John Cartwright (Loony) 110 (0.45%)
  • Simon Lane (Nine eleven) 66 (0.27%)
  • Robin Smith (Young) 63 (0.26%)
  • Lab maj 11,761 (47.87%)
  • 7.99% swing C to Lab

UKIP's campaign in Rotherham was boosted by a row over a local couple who had their foster children removed by the Labour council because they were UKIP members.

But worries about unemployment had proven to be more important to voters than the headlines about fostering, BBC political reporter James Vincent commented.

Having not been a Labour Party member for long, Ms Champion convinced enough voters to give her a chance during a very short campaign that started with questions over whether she was the right candidate, our correspondent added.

Mr Stranack, the best performing Conservative candidate of the night, said he was disappointed to come second in Croydon North, but ousting Labour had proven to be a "big challenge".

The Conservative, who was born with cerebral palsy, added: "I would like to challenge all of the main party leaders to look at the inspiration our Paralympians bought us over the summer and take the bold decision to select more candidates with disabilities."

Respect had hoped to pull off a repeat of George Galloway's surprise victory in Bradford West in April, when he overturned a 5,000 Labour majority to romp home by 10,000, after winning over the British Asian Muslim vote.

Continue reading the main story

Middlesbrough

  • Andy McDonald (Lab) 10,201 (60.48%, +14.60%)
  • Richard Elvin (UKIP) 1,990 (11.80%, +8.10%)
  • George Selmer (LD) 1,672 (9.91%, -10.00%)
  • Ben Houchen (C) 1,063 (6.30%, -12.48%)
  • Imdad Hussain (Peace) 1,060 (6.28%)
  • Peter Foreman (BNP) 328 (1.94%, -3.90%)
  • John Malcolm (TUSC) 277 (1.64%)
  • Mark Heslehurst (ND) 275 (1.63%)
  • Lab maj 8,211 (48.68%)
  • 3.25% swing UKIP to Lab

But Lee Jasper, the party's candidate in Croydon North and a former adviser to Ken Livingstone, won just 707 votes, placing sixth, and Yvonne Ridley, the Respect candidate in Rotherham, came fourth with 1,778 votes.

Turnout at all three contests was in the spotlight after fewer than 15% of voters cast a ballot in the first Police and Crime Commissioner elections in England and Wales - a peacetime low.

The Electoral Commission has launched an investigation into the woeful PCC turnout, which some were blaming on the dark November nights and poor weather.

Turnout in the Corby by-election, on the same day as the PCC ballot, was about 45%.

In the post-war period, the lowest Commons election turnout was 19.6% when Labour's Hilary Benn won Leeds Central in a June 1999 by-election.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Press 'need to act' after Leveson

30 November 2012 Last updated at 04:37 ET
David Cameron in House of Commons

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

David Cameron: "I'm not convinced... that statute is necessary"

The press has been urged to take action over Leveson Inquiry recommendations to regulate the newspaper industry.

Lord Justice Leveson called for a new independent watchdog - which he said should be underpinned by legislation.

Culture Secretary Maria Miller told the BBC "the gauntlet has been thrown down" to newspapers to outline how they would set up tough self-regulation instead.

Meanwhile, work is beginning on a draft bill to regulate the press, expected to be ready within a fortnight,

Lord Justice Leveson's 2,000-page report into press ethics, published on Thursday, found that press behaviour was "outrageous" and "wreaked havoc with the lives of innocent people".

He said the press - having failed to regulate itself in the past - must create a new and tough regulator but it had to be backed by legislation to ensure it was effective.

The report exposed divisions in the coalition government, with Prime Minister David Cameron opposing statutory control, unlike his deputy Nick Clegg, who wants a new law introduced without delay.

Speaking in the Commons, Mr Cameron said he broadly welcomed Lord Justice Leveson's principles to change the current system but that he had "serious concerns and misgivings" over bringing in laws to underpin any new body.

Continue reading the main story

Proposed new press law

Would:

  • Create a process to "validate" the independence and effectiveness of the new self-regulation body
  • Validate a new process of independent arbitration for complainants - which would benefit both the public and publishers by providing speedy resolutions
  • Place a duty on government to protect the freedom of press

Would not:

  • Establish a body to regulate the press directly
  • Give any Parliament or government rights to interfere with what newspapers publish

Labour leader Ed Miliband has joined Mr Clegg in supporting a new press law.

Following cross-party talks on Thursday night - which will resume next week - the Department for Culture, Media and Sport will begin the process of drawing up a draft bill implementing the Leveson recommendations.

The prime minister believes this process will only serve to highlight how difficult it is to try to legislate in a complex and controversial area while Labour and the Lib Dems think it will demonstrate the opposite.

Speaking on BBC Breakfast, Mrs Miller said: "Our concern is that we simply don't need to have that legislation to achieve the end of objectives and in drafting out this piece of legislation what we are going to be demonstrating is that it wouldn't be a simple two-clause bill."

She said Conservative ministers felt that legislation "would actually give the opportunity in the future to bring into question the ability of Parliament to stay out of the issue of free press and difficult for Parliament to not have a statutory framework on which they could hang further bits of legislation".

She went on: "At this point what we should be focusing in on is the fact that the gauntlet has been thrown down to the industry.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

Without statutory underpinning, this system will not work"

End Quote Gerry McCann

"The press industry need to be coming back with their response to the Leveson report. Their response to how they're going to put in place a self-regulatory body that adheres to the Leveson principles and that is what I want to see moving forward swiftly."

Many of Friday's newspapers have praised Mr Cameron's opposition to law-backed regulation.

But the father of Madeline McCann - the young girl who went missing in Portugal in 2007 - said Lord Justice Leveson's recommendations for press regulation did not go far enough.

Gerry McCann, who was the subject of "unbelievably damaging" newspaper reports that suggested he and his wife killed Madeline, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Full implementation of Lord [Justice] Leveson's report is the minimum acceptable compromise for me and, I think, for many other victims who have suffered at the hands of the press.

"Without statutory underpinning, this system will not work."

Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman told BBC Two's Newsnight: "I think that the House of Commons will want to take that forward, will want to make sure that - by the end of January - it has an opportunity to have a full debate and vote to show its support for taking Leveson's recommendations forward."

BBC political correspondent Iain Watson said that, at the core of this disagreement, were two separate political calculations.

Charlotte Church

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Charlotte Church, speaking on Question Time: 'I agree with the Leveson report'

David Cameron thought the press would swiftly agree to tougher self-regulation which would make any new law unnecessary, allowing him to go into the next election as a champion of a free press.

Labour and the Liberal Democrats, meanwhile, do not trust papers to clean up their own act and assume the victims of press intrusion will say they are being sold short.

Writing in the Guardian, Steve Coogan - who told the Leveson Inquiry that journalists had been going through his rubbish bins - said Mr Cameron was "playing a despicable political game - disingenuous at best, bare-faced lying at worst".

"By rejecting Leveson's call for statutory regulation, Cameron has hung the victims of crime out to dry."

He added: "Quite simply, if future regulation is not backed by statute, Leveson's report is nothing more than a large slap on the wrist."

Continue reading the main story

Mr Coogan is a supporter of the Hacked Off campaign, which represents victims of phone hacking and press intrusion including the parents of missing Madeleine McCann, and Christopher Jefferies - who was falsely accused of murdering Jo Yeates.

Another celebrity phone hacking victim, Charlotte Church, told BBC One's Question Time "all that the statutory underpinning should be able to do is make sure that there is a body, that those rules are enforced, and I don't see any way in which that can affect the free press."

BBC political editor Nick Robinson said Mr Cameron had the confidence of knowing that, in the long Parliamentary battle ahead, he had some rather important supporters on his side - the press.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Proposals to cut energy use due

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 29 November 2012 | 16.50

28 November 2012 Last updated at 19:00 ET Roger HarrabinBy Roger Harrabin Environment analyst

The UK government is considering paying firms for cutting electricity use as part of plans to try to save energy and reduce costs.

It is one of a number of proposals to be published alongside the Energy Bill.

The government outlined the Bill last week. It included extra investment in gas, renewables and nuclear to be paid for by households.

But it was criticised for failing to show how the plans would save the need for energy in the first place.

Proposals to cut energy use will be published alongside the Bill when it is formally published on Thursday.

Ministers say a 10% reduction in electricity demand could produce savings of around £4bn in 2030, which would more than compensate for the cost of making efficiency investments upfront.

The government is now considering paying firms for each kilowatt-hour saved through energy-saving measures such as low-energy lighting, and offering financial incentives to encourage people to buy efficient equipment for homes and businesses.

'Disappointing'

But critics are angry that the energy saving measures will appear as a consultation document, whilst the Bill itself concentrates on creating more power.

Matthew Spencer from the parliamentary group Green Alliance has been lobbying the government on the issue.

He told the BBC: "It is disappointing that we have to wait for another consultation before government decides whether to help people use less electricity. They should be using the Bill to create a market for electricity saving, which would avoid the building of as many costly power stations. It would put money back into people's pockets."

This is especially sensitive as a report this week estimated that energy-saving budgets for the poorest households had been halved by government.

Ministers will attempt to help households by announcing funds for advertising the so-called Green Deal, which will allow people to borrow cash to insulate their homes. The scheme has got off to a very bad start.

Abandoned target

Last week the government announced how they had resolved a bitter coalition row over energy. They agreed plans for households to spend nearly £100 a year subsidising renewables and nuclear, but abandoned long-term carbon emission targets for electricity.

The chancellor was the centre of controversy in those negotiations, and more questions will be asked of him today. His planned environmental tax, the Carbon Floor Price, will raise the cost of energy from fossil fuels.

This will push up people's energy bills, but the chancellor will keep the tax. Green groups say he should be recycling these funds into energy saving.

Energy will generate fierce debate in other areas too. Alongside the Bill, ministers will announce plans to exempt energy-intensive industries from additional costs arising from the transition to low-carbon energy.

Energy Secretary Ed Davey said: "Decarbonisation should not mean deindustrialisation. Energy-intensive industries are an important part of the UK economy. There would be no advantage - both for the UK economy and for global emissions reductions - in simply forcing UK businesses to relocate to other countries.

Losers

This move will be welcomed by business as it is pointless forcing industries to migrate to countries with lower pollution standards.

But environmentalists warn that some big firms are playing carbon rules to their own advantage.

The think tank Sandbag estimates that iron, steel and cement firms could have made 3.8bn euros thanks to their effective lobbying on European carbon allowances.

Smaller firms say they are often losers from energy prices. A survey by British Chambers of Commerce of almost 3,500 businesses showed that nearly 40% felt that rising costs have stunted their growth.

Over 60% were unaware of the Green Deal. Of those which knew the scheme, 30% doubted that savings anticipated by the government will actually be achieved.

'Rising costs'

Most businesses recognise the need to improve their energy efficiency, with 63% saying they are motivated to reduce their energy usage by environmental concerns

Dr Adam Marshall, director of policy at the BCC, said: "We have heard endless concerns about the rising costs of energy bills on households, but the impact that rising energy costs are having on businesses across the UK deserve the same attention."

The professional services firm, Ernst & Young, warned this week that government infighting and prevarication over clean energy investment has harmed the UK economy by deterring investors in low-carbon generation.

Many commentators will be relieved that the Bill is finally out.

Follow Roger Harrabin on Twitter: @rogerharrabin


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Lib Dems 'might ditch' data bill

28 November 2012 Last updated at 20:37 ET James LandaleBy James Landale Deputy political editor

The Lib Dems are considering their support for government plans to give the police new powers to monitor email and internet use, the BBC has learned.

Party sources say leader Nick Clegg is ready to use a parliamentary report, due out next week, to oppose the plans.

The draft Communications Data Bill would allow police access to details of people's email and internet use, which many Lib Dems oppose.

But Home Office sources insist the bill would become law by 2014.

At the moment, the police and intelligence services can get access to information about people's mobile phone use.

The bill would extend those powers to cover email and the internet. The authorities would be able to see details of who communicated with whom, and when and where, but they would not be able to see the content of the message.

'Non-committal'

The Home Office says these powers are needed to help the police and intelligence services fight organised crime, terrorist networks and paedophile rings.

But critics argue they would infringe civil liberties and have branded the bill a "snoopers' charter".

Sources said Mr Clegg met the Prime Minister face to face earlier this week to discuss the issue and was "noncommittal" about the bill's future.

The loss of Lib Dem support would place a question mark over the future of the bill as the Conservatives would struggle to push it through Parliament alone.

Labour accepts there is an issue to be addressed but has not yet said if it will support the bill.

A joint committee of MPs and peers has been considering the draft bill since the summer and it will publish next week what is expected to be a strongly critical report.

One senior Lib Dem minister said: "The report gives Nick an opportunity to kill the bill for good and that's what he wants to do." Another said: "This is a dead duck. It is a question of when, not if."

In its report, the joint committee on the draft Communications Data Bill will argue that:

  • The Home Office has failed to make the case for the new laws, not least by failing to show how the police use existing laws to monitor mobile phone data.
  • The bill infringes civil liberties and invades privacy by allowing the police access to a mass of new data without adequate safeguards. In particular, they will argue that in some internet use - particularly social media sites - it is difficult to distinguish between the details of the communication and the actual content of the message.
  • The measure would damage British businesses by forcing phone companies and internet service providers to store at huge cost for 12 months masses of new data that they would not otherwise keep.
  • The new pool of data would be open to abuse and present a security threat.

One committee source said: "It is critical of the approach the Home Office initially took and recommends more caution and a more proportionate way forward.

"It worries about individual liberties and principle and the costs and proportionality of what was initially recommended. How secure is this information? Are you certain it cannot be stolen by people who have access to it?"

The Lib Dem leadership has faced some internal criticism for supporting separate plans in the Justice and Security Bill to extend the use of so-called secret courts to hear sensitive intelligence material.

So some within the party argue that Mr Clegg should oppose the Communications Data bill to reaffirm the Liberal Democrats' civil liberties' credentials.

Some Lib Dems believe that there is not much depth of support for the bill among the Conservatives and they will not go to the wire to save the measure.

One source claimed that even some Home Office ministers have doubts. They also noted that the Conservatives had opposed measures like this in their election manifesto, promising that they would "scale back Labour's database state".

But Home Office sources insisted that the government remained determined to get the bill onto the statute book by 2014.

They said the police were crying out for this new system which was a vital tool not just to detect crime but also to prosecute criminals.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

UKBA 'failed to check' tip-offs

28 November 2012 Last updated at 21:46 ET

Thousands of overseas students may have been allowed to stay in Britain illegally because UK Border Agency (UKBA) staff failed to check out tip-offs about them, a report has revealed.

When non-EU students do not enrol, stop attending courses or breach visa rules, colleges report them to the UKBA.

Chief inspector of immigration John Vine said a backlog of 153,000 such reports had built up at one point.

Ministers say they have "toughened the rules" on student visas.

Mr Vine, whose team examined work at three UKBA offices in Sheffield, Delhi and Beijing, said the agency had "no targets in place for responding to notifications made using the sponsor management system".

"As a result, notifications of changes to circumstances of students, details of students failing to enrol or attend classes, or curtailment of sponsorship were not being acted upon," he said.

"Over 150,000 notifications had accumulated and were awaiting action, meaning that potentially thousands of students had retained leave to remain when they should not have done so."

This was "a significant failure," he added.

He said that, by May of this year, all the outstanding tip-offs had been investigated and said the UKBS had "launched an operation to identify and remove people, including students, who had overstayed beyond the term of their visa".

He said such work should be "an ongoing priority rather than the subject of a one-off operation by the agency".

Inspectors also warned that increasing numbers were entering Britain on visas designed for short periods of study which were not subject to the same checks as those for longer courses.

'Ripe for exploitation'

Shadow immigration minister Chris Bryant said the "massive 153,000 backlog of people who have potentially gone rogue emphasises that, with Theresa May running the Home Office, we are getting the worst of both worlds".

"Student visitor visas have fewer checks than full student visas and are therefore ripe for exploitation by those looking to avoid tougher checks," he added.

But Immigration Minister Mark Harper said the government had "toughened the rules to ensure that genuine students are not taken advantage of by organisations looking to sell immigration not education".

"At the same time we have a great offer for the brightest and best international talent who want to study at our world class institutions," he added.

He said he was pleased the report "recognises the operational improvements that have been made at the agency".

Mistakes 'inadvertent'

Earlier this month, Mr Vine accused the border agency in a report of misleading MPs about the amount of background checks made on historic asylum cases.

He said the UKBA had supplied inaccurate information to MPs about a backlog of cases and said Parliament had received incorrect assurances about progress.

At the time, a Home Office spokesman said it was turning around the "troubled" agency.

On Tuesday, senior UKBA official Jonathan Sedgwick apologised to the Home Affairs Committee for misleading MPs but insisted the mistakes had been "inadvertent".


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Rush to finish Egypt constitution

29 November 2012 Last updated at 01:34 ET
Riot police and tear gas

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

President Mursi's decree has sparked huge protests across Egypt

The assembly writing a new Egyptian constitution says it hopes to vote on a draft version as early as Thursday.

The news came as the constitutional court indicated it would rule on Sunday whether to dissolve the assembly.

Egypt's judiciary is in a stand-off with President Mohammed Mursi and his Islamist supporters, after Mr Mursi last week issued a decree granting himself sweeping new powers.

The decree has sparked huge protests across the country.

As those protests continued on Wednesday, officials at the constituent assembly said it was finishing its draft constitution, even though Mr Mursi had recently extended its deadline to complete the work until February.

A vote was expected on Thursday, state media reported.

The BBC's Jon Leyne, in Cairo, says issuing a constitution in these circumstances would be a deeply inflammatory move.

Opposition figure and former Arab League chief Amr Moussa told Reuters news agency: "This is nonsensical and one of the steps that shouldn't be taken, given the background of anger and resentment to the current constitutional assembly."

'Sacred mission'

The constituent assembly is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists, who back Mr Mursi.

Liberal, left-wing and Christian members have boycotted the body, accusing the Islamists of trying to impose their vision.

Continue reading the main story
  • Reopen investigations into killings of protesters; retrials of those accused
  • No appeals against constitutional decrees made since Mursi came to power
  • President to appoint the public prosecutor (must be aged at least 40)
  • Constituent assembly to get two months extra to draft new constitution
  • No judicial authority can dissolve the constituent assembly or the upper house of parliament (Shura Council)
  • President authorised to take any measures to preserve the revolution or safeguard national security

Its latest move appeared to be aimed at dodging a ruling by the constitutional court on Sunday on whether the assembly should be dissolved.

The constitutional court's deputy chairman, Maher Sami, said in a televised speech that the ruling would go ahead.

"The court is determined to rise above its pain and continue its sacred mission until the end, wherever that takes us," he said.

The court has already dissolved the lower house of Egypt's parliament, which was led by the Muslim Brotherhood.

The declaration that sparked protests gave Mr Mursi powers to take any measures to protect the revolution, and stated that no court could overturn his decisions.

It is valid until a new constitution is in place.

Critics accuse Mr Mursi of trying to seize absolute powers.

Supporters say the decrees were needed to protect the gains of the revolution against a judiciary with deep ties to overthrown President Hosni Mubarak.

On Monday, Mr Mursi sought to defuse the crisis by telling senior judges that the decrees would be restricted to "sovereign matters" designed to protect institutions.

But judges who attended the meeting said they were not satisfied and wanted the measure completely withdrawn.

On Wednesday, judges called a strike, saying appeals courts and the court of cassation would halt work until the decree was revoked.

The president was expected to make a televised address to the nation about the decree late on Thursday.

There have been running protests since the decree was issued, often spilling over into violent clashes between protesters and riot police.

The Muslim Brotherhood and the more radical al-Nour party have called for a counter-protest in Cairo on Saturday.

If approved by the constituent assembly, the draft constitution would then be put to a national referendum.

Send your pictures and videos to yourpics@bbc.co.uk or text them to 61124 (UK) or +44 7624 800 100 (International). If you have a large file you can upload here.

Read the terms and conditions


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Voters go to by-election polls

29 November 2012 Last updated at 02:41 ET

Voting has started in three parliamentary by-elections.

The contests are in Croydon North, Middlesbrough and Rotherham, with polling stations closing at 22:00 GMT and the results due a few hours later.

The Croydon and Middlesbrough contests were triggered by the deaths of MPs Malcolm Wicks and Sir Stuart Bell and that in Rotherham by the resignation of Denis MacShane.

At the 2010 general election, Labour retained all three seats.

Mr Wicks won Croydon North by 16,483 votes, while Sir Stuart won Middlesbrough by 8,689.

And, in Rotherham, Mr MacShane was victorious by 10,462 votes.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Concern over salt level in cheese

29 November 2012 Last updated at 02:52 ET

Large amounts of unnecessary salt are being added to cheese, the health pressure group Consensus Action on Salt and Health (Cash), has warned.

The group analysed 722 cheese portions of 30g each and found many contained more salt than a bag of crisps.

The saltiest type was roquefort at 1.06g per 30g. But within varieties salt content varied - suggesting it is possible to reduce levels.

The Dairy Council said cheese provided a wide range of nutrients.

Too much salt is known to raise blood pressure, which increases the risk of heart disease and stroke.

The survey looked at over 30 different cheese varieties from seven supermarkets over four months up to November 2012, assessing salt content in a standard 30g portion size.

The saltiest cheese varieties were the blue cheese Roquefort, with 1.06g of salt in a 30g portion, feta and halloumi.

The cheese varieties with the lowest salt levels were mozzarella, emmental and wensleydale.

Within cheese varieties there was also a large variation in salt content between products.

Continue reading the main story

How salty?

  • Recommended daily maximum: 6g
  • Roquefort, 30g portion: 1.06g salt
  • Bacon rasher: 0.9g
  • Halloumi, 30g: 0.81g
  • Seawater, 30g: 0.75g
  • Cheddar, 30g: 0.52g
  • Packet of crisps: 0.5g
  • Mozzarella, 30g: 0.30g

The survey found that for gorgonzola, one cheese product was nearly six times more saltier than the least salty, and large differences were also seen in wensleydale and cheddar.

Cash said salt intake should be less than 6g a day - about a teaspoon - and urged consumers to choose either a lower salt version or eat less cheese.

Cash chairman Prof Graham MacGregor said: "Even small reductions will have large health benefits. For every one gram reduction in population salt intake we can prevent 12,000 heart attacks, stroke and heart failure, half of which would have been fatal.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

Cheese manufacturers have worked very hard to reduce salt levels in their products"

End Quote Dr Judith Bryans Dairy Council

"The Department of Health must now stop its delaying tactics and set new much lower targets for cheese manufacturers, and make sure they achieve them. The cheese industry must comply if we are to save the maximum number of lives"

Benefits of cheese

But others warned the conclusions Cash has drawn from its research paint an incomplete picture.

Dr Judith Bryans, director of the Dairy Council, a non-profit-making organisation, said: "The Cash survey is mixing up the effect of cheese on health with the effect of salt on health.

"Cheese provides a wide range of nutrients including protein, vitamins and important minerals such as calcium.

"Salt is an integral part of the cheese-making process. It is not added for taste or flavour but for safety and technical reasons.

"Cheese manufacturers have worked very hard to reduce salt levels in their products and worked constructively and positively with government agencies to do this whilst producing products which are nutritious, safe and acceptable to the consumer."

Around 700,000 tonnes of cheese are consumed by UK households a year, and cheese is the third biggest contributor of salt to the UK diet after bacon and bread.

The Department of Health said it was tackling salt levels in food.

Public Health Minister Anna Soubry said: "Soon we will have a single front-of-pack labelling scheme which will make it easier for people to compare products, and choose the healthier options available.

"Through the Responsibility Deal, we are in discussions with industry about how they can further reduce the salt levels in their food."


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Leveson media report findings due

29 November 2012 Last updated at 04:33 ET
The Dowlers give evidence to Lord Justice Leveson

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Inquiry highlights: The parents of Milly Dowler were among those who gave evidence

Lord Justice Leveson is set to publish his report into the culture, practice and ethics of the press.

His eight-month inquiry heard from media intrusion victims including actor Hugh Grant, singer Charlotte Church and the family of murdered Millie Dowler.

It is understood the report, which runs to hundreds of pages, criticises press, politicians and police.

David Cameron and Deputy PM Nick Clegg have met to discuss it amid reports of a possible split over press regulation.

Lord Justice Leveson - whose inquiry was set up in the wake of the scandal over phone hacking by journalists at the now-defunct News of the World newspaper - is widely expected to recommend some form of statutory press regulation overseen by an independent body.

Continue reading the main story

It was an inquiry that imperilled, briefly, the cabinet career of then Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt; embarrassed David Cameron with revelations about his style of text messaging; and exposed the close relationships once enjoyed by some politicians, newspaper proprietors and police officers.

As well as any criticism of the conduct of individuals who gave evidence, Lord Justice Leveson's report will be examined for what he says about the future running of Britain's newspapers.

Many in the industry support more muscular self-regulation -- the creation of a new body which could investigate malpractice and impose fines.

All the national newspapers are opposed to an alternative option -- an independent regulator backed by law. They say this would give politicians a new power over the press.

Lord Justice Leveson will make recommendations.

The pressure will then be on the prime minister to act.

The press is currently self-regulated through the Press Complaints Commission (PCC).

Many Conservatives oppose the possibility of statutory regulation while Liberal Democrats are understood to be ready to support such a move.

The office of House of Commons Speaker John Bercow has said it is ready to accommodate a Lib Dem request for the deputy prime minister to oppose Mr Cameron at the despatch box after the prime minister's statement at 15:00 GMT if the pair cannot agree a response.

On Wednesday, both were given advance copies of the report, which will be published at 13:30 GMT on Thursday. Labour leader Ed Miliband will receive his copy on Thursday morning.

A coalition committee will also meet on Thursday morning to try to find a way forward.

BBC political editor Nick Robinson said everyone was seeking independent regulation but the question was what that meant and whether a new law was needed to establish it and make sure all newspapers took part.

Deciding the way forward was one of the most difficult decisions the prime minister would ever face and one of the most difficult decisions that would go through the House of Commons in the months to come, he added.

Mr Cameron, who previously said he intended to implement the findings of the Leveson Inquiry provided they were not "bonkers", told MPs at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday he wanted to find a cross-party consensus on improving regulation and moving away from the "unacceptable" status quo.

He said he wanted an "independent regulatory system that can deliver and in which the public have confidence".

Chris Jefferies in 2010

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Mr Miliband responded: "I hope we can work on an all-party basis. This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for real change and I hope that this House can make it happen."

Speaking as he left his home ahead of the report's publication, Mr Clegg said said politicians would have to strike a balance in their response.

"In this whole process everybody wants two things. Firstly a strong, independent, raucous press, who can hold people in positions of power to account and, secondly, to protect ordinary people, the vulnerable, the innocents when the press overstep the mark. That's the balance we're trying to strike, and I'm sure we will "

Bristol landlord Chris Jefferies, who was wrongly arrested for the murder of Joanna Yeates in 2010 and then won damages from a number of newspapers over their reports, said his experience had been "absolutely devastating".

Continue reading the main story
  • Statutory regulation: Stricter regulation of the press, enforceable by law
  • Statutory underpinning: Self-regulatory body with statutory framework which enforces newspapers to sign up
  • New Press Complaints Council: Tougher self-regulation body with investigative arm. One proposal suggests body should be independent from newspaper industry
  • Newspaper ombudsman: Self-regulatory body, working alongside PCC, to deal with standards

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme he wanted to see an independent regulator, with investigative powers established by statute with the "powers to discipline those parts of the press which contravene the codes".

But former Press Complaints Commission member and Daily Mail journalist Paul Horrocks said that while tighter regulation was essential "what we don't want is that toughening up to be in some kind of law... because that then really threatens the freedom of the press".

Meanwhile, a poll conducted for BBC Radio 5 live suggests that two-thirds of British adults have no trust - or little trust - that newspapers tell the truth.

Just over 1,000 people were questioned on the telephone by ComRes last weekend, with nearly a half also saying they wanted to see the press regulated by rules agreed and enforced by the courts.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Call to build homes on open land

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 28 November 2012 | 16.50

27 November 2012 Last updated at 20:23 ET

Increasing the amount of developed land by a third would address the housing shortage, according to Planning Minister Nick Boles.

He told BBC Newsnight building on another 2-3% of the land in England - bringing the total to about 12% - would "solve the housing problem."

Mr Boles said open land would be built on in exchange for commitments to defend greenbelt spaces.

He called for "beautiful" housing that was sensitive to its local area.

In his first interview about his portfolio since he entered government, Mr Boles has reopened the debate over how much more housing Britain needs and where.

Describing current housebuilding as "ugly rubbish", he argued that improved design might persuade local communities currently opposed to more development to support further building.

"The built environment can be more beautiful than nature and we shouldn't obsess about the fact that the only landscapes that are beautiful are open - sometimes buildings are better," he said.

To this end, the minister says that new housing will not be on the greenbelt, but he does say that open land will be targeted.

Nick Boles

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Planning Minister Nick Boles: "People have got to accept that we've got to build more on some open land"

"We're going to protect the greenbelt but if people want to have housing for their kids they have to accept we need to build more on some open land.

"In the UK and England at the moment we've got about 9% of land developed. All we need to do is build on another 2-3% of land and we'll have solved a housing problem."

Mr Boles also told Newsnight that having a house with a garden was a "basic moral right, like healthcare and education".

"There's a right to a home with a little bit of ground around it to bring your family up in," he said.

Controversial proposals

After a battle over planning reform, in the spring the government and a range of opponents appeared to reach a truce. Now Mr Boles has set out what the government's proposals will entail.

He was made planning minister by David Cameron in the September reshuffle and is a well-known proponent of liberalising planning regulations in Britain.

Before his appointment, in a speech to Tory colleagues, he had described opponents of the government's planning reforms as "scaremongering Luddites".

But his plans will be controversial with his Conservative colleagues.

In recent weeks, Tory MP Nadhim Zahawi has reacted angrily to the adjudication by Secretary of State for Communities Eric Pickles, who oversees planning, to give the go-ahead to a greenfield development on the edge of Stratford-upon-Avon.

Persuasion

There was also local unhappiness in Winchester when Mr Pickles approved a development at Barton Farm.

"It's my job to make the arguments to these people that if they carry on writing letters, their kids are never going to get a place with a garden to bring up their grandkids," said Mr Boles.

"I accept we haven't been able to persuade them. I think it would be easier if we could persuade them that the new development would be beautiful."

Talking about the historic town of Stamford, situated in his own Lincolnshire constituency, he said: "Local tradespeople... decided they wanted to build nice places to live.

"We've somehow forgotten to do that, which is why people object to us building on open farm and land - they build ugly rubbish. If we remember to build places like Stamford, people won't mind us building in fields."

Watch Newsnight's Allegra Stratton's report on Wednesday, 28 November, 2012 at 22:30 GMT on BBC Two or watch afterwards on BBC iPlayer.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Rail commuters face 6% fare rise

27 November 2012 Last updated at 22:29 ET

Some rail commuters in England will face a rise of nearly 6% for their season tickets next year.

Fares in England, Scotland and Wales will go up by 4.2% on average. Last month, the PM intervened to limit average rises to 1% above inflation.

The biggest rise in 2013 would be 5.9% - from £4,588 to £4,860 - for an annual ticket from Canterbury to London, according to watchdog Passenger Focus.

It said firms had showed constraint but commuters would still "feel this pain".

While Passenger Focus says the £272 increase in the Canterbury to London annual ticket will be the biggest, it also highlights ticket price rises including for the Bournemouth to London route - up £240 to £5,988.

Continue reading the main story

Examples of new prices

  • Canterbury-London: £4,860 (up 5.9%)
  • Llanelli-Swansea: £624 (up 5.4%)
  • Ludlow-Hereford: £1,992 (up 5.3%)
  • Tonbridge-London: £3,796 (up 5.2%)
  • Aylesbury-London: £3,632 (up 3.2%)
  • Ellesmere Port-Chester: £720 (up 2.3%)
  • Shenfield-London: £2,704 (down 0.6%)

Source: Passenger Focus

And an annual ticket from Gloucester to Birmingham will cost an extra £140, it says.

In August, it had been announced that rail fares in England would rise by an average of 6.2%.

The Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation as of July 2012 - which stood at 3.2% - plus 3% was initially used to calculate the average rise.

But last month, David Cameron announced the average rise for the next two years would be capped at RPI plus 1%.

The figure for 2012 is therefore RPI as of July 2012 - 3.2% - plus 1%.

Train firms are able to raise some season tickets above 4.2% as long as the average increase is no more than that ceiling.

Some tickets will rise by as little as 2.3% while one ticket, from Shenfield, in Essex, to London will be £16 cheaper, at £2,704.

'Welcome promise'

Rail Minister Norman Baker said the government had taken "pro-active steps" because family budgets were being squeezed.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

Successive governments have instructed train companies every year to increase these regulated fares on average by more than inflation"

End Quote Association of Train Operating Companies

"This decision puts an average of £45 per year back into the pockets of over a quarter of a million annual season ticket holders," he said.

But Passenger Focus chief executive Anthony Smith said that, "after years of above-inflation fare rises, fresh increases are piling pressure on already high fares".

"The government and the rail industry must now work together to deliver on the welcome promise to get fare rises in line with inflation."

The Association of Train Operating Companies, meanwhile, said it was the government "not train companies that decides how much season tickets should rise on average each year".

"Successive governments have instructed train companies every year to increase these regulated fares on average by more than inflation." a spokesman said.

'Government collusion'

BBC transport correspondent Richard Westcott said 2013 would be the tenth consecutive year that regulated rail fares had gone up by more than inflation in England.

Regulated fares, which include season tickets and off-peak intercity journeys, make up half of all fares.

Consecutive rises had left the country with some of the most expensive trains in Europe, our correspondent said.

Manuel Cortes, leader of the TSSA rail union, said thousands of commuters across south-east England would be "paying more than £5,000 a year for their season tickets because of the government's unfair annual inflation-plus fare rises".

And RMT general secretary Bob Crow said train companies "with the collusion of the government, will be jacking up fares by up to 6% in the new year as they launch a full-frontal assault on passengers in the name of profit".

There are no fare increases currently planned in Northern Ireland after a 3% rise in April.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Don't curb freedom, Leveson urged

28 November 2012 Last updated at 03:06 ET
Conor Burns MP

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Conor Burns MP: ''Statutory regulation should be an absolute last resort''

More than 80 MPs and peers have urged the man carrying out an inquiry into UK media standards not to recommend a press regulation law.

The cross-party group, including eight former cabinet ministers and London Olympics chairman Lord Coe, says any such move would damage press freedom.

Lord Justice Leveson is due to publish his report on Thursday.

The group, which has written to the Guardian and the Daily Telegraph, wants a stronger "self-regulatory" system.

The Leveson Inquiry was established by the prime minister in July last year and looked into the culture, practices and ethics of the press.

It was commissioned following allegations of illegal phone-hacking at the News of the World.

Prime Minister David Cameron, who has already warned politicians not to pre-empt its findings, will receive his copy of the report at lunchtime - 24 hours before its details are made public.

'State licensing'

Lord Justice Leveson was asked to produce a list of recommendations for a more effective policy and regulatory regime for the press, which would preserve its independence while encouraging higher ethical and professional standards.

At the moment the press is self-regulated through the Press Complaints Commission (PCC).

Lord Justice Leveson is widely expected to recommend some form of statutory regulation overseen by an independent body.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

Leveson demonstrated not a sole failure of regulation but rather of law enforcement"

End Quote Cross-party group of MPs

But the politicians, led by former Labour home secretary David Blunkett and Conservative MP Conor Burns, argue in their letter this could be detrimental to free speech, saying: "As parliamentarians, we believe in free speech and are opposed to the imposition of any form of statutory control even if it is dressed up as underpinning."

They add: "No form of statutory regulation of the press would be possible without the imposition of state licensing - abolished in Britain in 1695. State licensing is inimical to any idea of press freedom and would radically alter the balance of our unwritten constitution.

"There are also serious concerns that statutory regulation of the print media may shift the balance to the digital platforms which, as recent events have shown through the fiasco of Newsnight-Twitter, would further undermine the position of properly moderated and edited print journalism."

The group - which includes Commons culture media and sport committee chairman John Whittingdale, Downton Abbey writer Lord Fellowes, former Commons Speaker Baroness Boothroyd and ex-cabinet ministers Lord Tebbit, Liam Fox, John Redwood and Peter Lilley - has written to the Guardian and the Daily Telegraph,

The group backs a proposal from former PCC chairman Lord Hunt and Lord Black, one-time chairman of the body that finances the commission, for a "totally new" version of the regulator.

They propose an independent body with increased powers to investigate complaints and illegal behaviour, levy fines of up to £1m and award compensation, and enforce membership by newspapers for the first time.

'Open-minded'

It argues that the "press abuse chronicled at Leveson was almost wholly about actions which were against the law. It demonstrated not a sole failure of regulation but rather of law enforcement.

Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

It is not often that the prime minister, his deputy and their most senior advisers clear their diaries"

End Quote

"However the status quo is not an option. We cannot countenance newspapers behaving as some have in the past. The solution is not new laws but a profound restructuring of the self-regulatory system."

The letter concludes: "Public debate will necessarily follow publication of the Leveson report and will be needed to provide confidence in a rigorous tough new system of self-regulation. Such a debate will lead to a speedy way of establishing a new self-regulatory regime that can restore confidence in the press."

However, some campaigners say the current system of self-regulation, overseen by the Press Complaints Commission, is inadequate and that tougher rules are needed to curb newspapers' excesses.

Earlier this month, 42 Conservative MPs and peers wrote to the Guardian arguing in favour of some form of statutory underpinning for press regulation.

Broadcaster Anne Diamond, who gave evidence to the Leveson Inquiry about her experience with the press, told BBC Breakfast that "self-regulation has been given its chance and it hasn't worked".

"The only way to have some real teeth behind some agreed code of conduct is to have some kind of statutory underpinning... You have to change the culture and the enforcement."

Meanwhile, Martin Moore, director of the Media Standards Trust charity, said the challenge for Lord Justice Leveson was to balance the need for some sort of redress for "ordinary people" with freedom of the press.

It is up to David Cameron to decide whether to implement Lord Justice Leveson's recommendations.

On Sunday Downing Street said the prime minister was "open-minded" about the future regulation of the press.

Previously he said he intended to implement the findings of the Leveson inquiry, provided they were not "bonkers".

Claims that News of the World journalists had hacked the voicemail of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler led to the closure of the Sunday tabloid and brought about the Leveson Inquiry.

The parents of Madeleine McCann, who went missing aged three on holiday in Portugal in 2007, were also among the alleged hacking victims.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Alcohol minimum price details due

28 November 2012 Last updated at 03:26 ET By Nick Triggle Health correspondent, BBC News

Ministers are to unveil plans later for a minimum price for alcohol in England and Wales as part of a drive to tackle problem drinking.

The Home Office is expected to publish a consultation on the proposal, which was first put forward in the government's alcohol strategy in March.

A price of 40p per unit was suggested at the time.

But pressure has been mounting on ministers to follow Scotland's lead, where 50p has been proposed.

The aim of a minimum price would be to alter the cost of heavily discounted drinks sold in shops and supermarkets. It is not expected to affect the price of drinks in pubs.

The Times predicted a 45p per unit minimum would be set and it said this would raise the price for the average can of beer or cider to £1.12.

According to the NHS website the average can of 4.5% strength lager contains around two units of alcohol, while a small glass of wine contains 1.5 units.

There has been evidence of some outlets selling alcohol at a loss to encourage customers through the doors, with cans of lager going for 20p and two-litre bottles of cider available for under £2.

'Pre-loading'

Ministers have been particularly critical of such practices, blaming them for what has been dubbed "pre-loading", where people binge-drink before going out.

The alcohol strategy linked this phenomenon to the rising levels of alcohol-related violence and hospital admissions, of which there are more than a million a year.

At the time, ministers said a 40p minimum price could save 900 lives a year and prevent 50,000 crimes by the end of the decade.

But Miles Beale, chief executive of the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, said there was "no evidence" minimum alcohol pricing would be effective in tackling alcohol misuse.

He said it would unfairly impact the majority of people, who drank responsibly, and he added it was possible it was illegal under EU law.

Mr Beale said: "The impact at 50p would see two thirds of prices in supermarkets and off-licences rise with a bottle of vodka increasing in price from £9 to £13.13."

He said the policy was being driven by the pub industry, who wanted to encourage people to drink in pubs by driving up the price of the competition.

Dr Vivienne Nathanson, from the British Medical Association, said the changes in pricing could help to stop young people binge drinking.

Continue reading the main story

It's a complex problem and a silver bullet, as minimum unit pricing is supposed to be, simply won't do it"

End Quote Miles Beale Wine and Spirit Trade Association

She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Alcohol is a dose-related poison, in other words the more you drink the more harm it causes, so by reducing the amount they are drinking over the safe limit you are helping to save them.

"It isn't a small minority of the population who are drinking excessively, it's nearly a quarter. That's a huge number of people who are drinking at levels that are hazardous to their health and we really have to throw everything we can (at it) to save lives."

As well as including details about a minimum price, the consultation is also likely to give more information about other alcohol measures, such as giving local agencies extra powers to restrict opening hours and banning multi-buy promotions.

There was also a proposal for a late-night levy to make clubs and pubs help pay for policing in the original strategy.

However, it is the minimum pricing proposal that has attracted most of the attention - and opposition from the industry.

Christopher Snowdon, author of a report on minimum pricing

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Christopher Snowdon, author of a report on minimum pricing: ''Low prices are a good thing''

The Scottish government plan, which is not due to start until April 2013, was challenged on legal grounds by the Scotch Whisky Association and the European Spirits Organisation.

They claimed it was up to Westminster, rather than Holyrood, to decide such an issue and they said it was also incompatible with the EU's "general principles of free trade and undistorted competition".

The legal challenges were heard in the Court of Session in Edinburgh last month and a judgement is expected before the end of the year.

Separately the European Commission is looking into the legality of the Scottish government's actions.

A spokesman for the British Retail Consortium said most of the industry was opposed to minimum pricing as it penalised the majority of people who were responsible drinkers while "doing nothing to address the root causes of harmful drinking".

Eric Appleby, chief executive of Alcohol Concern, said: "We're paying a heavy price for alcohol misuse and setting a minimum unit price will help us on the road to changing this.

"But we cannot cut the misery caused by excessive drinking, whether it's crime or hospitalisation, through price alone.

"We need tighter controls around licensing, giving local authorities and police forces all the tools they need to get a firm grip on the way alcohol is being sold in their area. We have an opportunity to make an enormous difference to the lives of thousands of people - we must seize it."

The Home Office said the consultation was targeted at "harmful drinkers, problem pubs and irresponsible shops" and a spokesman added: "Those who enjoy a quiet drink or two have nothing to fear from our proposals."


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Twin blasts shake Damascus suburb

28 November 2012 Last updated at 04:05 ET

At least 29 people have been killed and many injured by two car bomb explosions in a south-eastern district of Syria's capital, Damascus, activists say.

The Sana news agency said "terrorists" were behind the blasts in Jaramana.

Television pictures showed firemen hosing down the charred wrecks of two vehicles. Several buildings also appeared to have been damaged.

A BBC reporter in Jaramana says there were clashes between government forces and rebels there earlier on Wednesday.

There has been fierce fighting in recent days in the countryside around Damascus, known as the Ghouta, particularly in eastern areas.

Airbase 'seized'

The pro-government TV channel, Addounia, said the explosions occurred shortly after 06:40 (04:40 GMT).

"Terrorists blew up two car bombs filled with a large amount of explosives in the main square of the town," the official Sana news agency reported.

Several residents were killed and wounded, and homes and shops were damaged, it added.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), a UK-based activist group, said 29 people had died and dozens had been injured. Addounia also quoted a reporter at the scene as saying the death toll was 20.

Two smaller bombs also exploded in Jaramana at around the same time, Sana said, adding that nobody was killed by the blasts.

Jaramana is a predominantly Druze and Christian district, where supporters of the government have reportedly set up armed groups to repel rebel attacks.

On 29 October, 11 people were killed in a car bombing in Jaramana.

The Local Co-ordination Committees (LCC), an opposition activist network, said 48 people were killed in the capital and its suburbs on Tuesday. It put the nationwide death toll at 131, including 12 children.

The rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA) overran an air force base in the Sayyida Zainab area, to the south of Damascus, and fought off several attempts by security forces to storm several suburbs, the LCC added.

Activists estimate that more than 40,000 people have died since the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad began in March 2011.

Send your pictures and videos to yourpics@bbc.co.uk or text them to 61124 (UK) or +44 7624 800 100 (International). If you have a large file you can upload here.

Read the terms and conditions


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

'Justice cheated' by Cyril Smith

28 November 2012 Last updated at 04:34 ET

The failure to charge Sir Cyril Smith with sex abuse means "justice has been cheated", a solicitor representing one of his alleged victims has said.

On Tuesday Greater Manchester Police (GMP) acknowledged Smith was a sex abuser of boys in the late 1960s,

Eight men had accused the former Rochdale MP, who died two years ago aged 82, of abusing them as teenagers at a hostel in the 1960s.

Lawyer Alan Collins said they had been vindicated "40 or 50 years too late".

One of the eight men is to sue Rochdale Council, Mr Collins has confirmed.

'Very tragic'

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has admitted Sir Cyril should have been charged with sex crimes more than 40 years ago.

Although he was not charged as a result of inquiries in 1970 and the 1990s, the CPS said procedural changes meant a prosecution would have been pursued today.

Mr Collins, a partner at the Pannone law firm, said: "Whilst the news is very welcome it's also very tragic because justice has been cheated.

"These victims have lived with the consequences of what happened to them for decades.

"They seek acceptance by those in authority that they were abused because this allows them to draw a line in the sand and move on."

The leader of Rochdale Council, Councillor Colin Lambert, said: "Where the council has a liability, solicitors will talk and seek to move forward."

In a statement, Sir Cyril's family said they were "deeply saddened and concerned" by the allegations "made so long after Sir Cyril's death and at a time when he is no longer able to defend himself".


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Met domestic violence crackdown

28 November 2012 Last updated at 04:44 ET

Police in London have arrested 264 people at the start of a week-long crackdown on domestic violence.

Officers carried out a series of raids across the capital earlier as part of the operation to stop people suffering abuse and violence.

According to police, about one in three women will suffer some form of physical or sexual abuse by their partner.

Assistant Commissioner Simon Byrne said: "Suffering behind closed doors should not and cannot be ignored."

He added: "The scale of the violence and abuse caused by those in domestic relationships is shocking.

"We all have a responsibility to put a stop to domestic violence."


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Minor injuries compensation axed

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 27 November 2012 | 16.50

26 November 2012 Last updated at 20:36 ET

Violent crime victims who suffer minor injuries will not get compensation under changes which have come into effect in England, Wales and Scotland.

Victims who suffer injuries including a broken nose, mild concussion, temporary deafness or minor burns will be among those no longer eligible.

Shopworkers' union Usdaw said many retail staff injured in armed robberies and assaults would lose out.

Ministers say the reforms will shave £50m off the annual £200m bill.

However, in 2011/12 the criminal injuries compensation bill rose to about £450m, largely caused by a backlog of payments.

BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said the reforms to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme - including the scrapping of five payment levels - were the most significant since a sliding scale of payments was introduced to simplify it 16 years ago.

Usdaw said MPs who had voted for the changes should "never again have the gall" to say they put victims first.

In September, in a move hailed by Victim Support as "a turnaround", Justice Minister Helen Grant said she would reconsider the plans after the charity's protests as well as those by MPs and unions.

But when a parliamentary committee met at the start of this month, the unchanged plans were approved by nine votes to seven.

That led Labour to accuse the government of "stacking" the Seventh Delegated Legislation Committee by ensuring people on the government payroll - including four parliamentary private secretaries - turned up to vote.

The Ministry of Justice says it is "dedicated to preserving compensation to the most seriously-injured victims of crime".

"But where less serious injuries have been caused, we believe taxpayers' money is better spent providing support and help rather than what are often small payments well after the crime has been committed," a spokesperson said.


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More

Floods continue to threaten homes

27 November 2012 Last updated at 03:07 ET
Pumps and sandbags in York

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

In North Yorkshire, more than fifty houses in Pickering are under threat from rising water levels

Residents in up to 500 properties in north Wales have been advised to leave their homes after the River Elwy broke its banks - and forecasters say the threat of floods remains in many areas.

An emergency centre has been set up at a leisure centre in St Asaph.

In North Yorkshire, more than 50 houses in Pickering are currently under threat from rising water levels.

About 200 flood warnings are in force in England and Wales and there are two for the Scottish Borders region.

The wet conditions are set to ease after heavy rain in northern England and north Wales, but there are fears saturated ground could lead to further flooding and travel disruption.

The flooding risk in Denbighshire is also affecting the villages of Abergele, Llanfairtalhaiarn, Llangernyw and Llansannan.

Inspector Mark Davies, from North Wales Police, said: "The Environment Agency tell us water levels are rising and getting worse.

"We haven't had any reports of people in severe difficulty but it has been distressing for people flooded in their own homes."

Continue reading the main story

Weather information

From the BBC:

Elsewhere:

And in Cornwall, the A39 at Perranarworthal is closed in both directions because of flooding and a poor road surface.

Flooding is also continuing to affect East Coast rail routes including between Durham and York, and between Berwick-upon-Tweed and Newcastle.

East Coast Trains says there is flooding on the line six miles south of Darlington, causing delays of up to 30 minutes.

The latest Environment Agency data shows 940 homes have suffered flooding since last Wednesday.

Speaking on BBC Breakfast, Environment Secretary Owen Paterson denied talks between the government and insurers about how to provide affordable premiums in areas at high risk of flooding had "stalled".

The Association of British Insurers had said discussions about extending the existing agreement obliging insurers to provide cover while the government continues to improve flood defences was at "crisis point".

The Environment Agency, which has issued 206 flood warnings - up from 185 on Monday night - says the flood risk across the UK "remains elevated".

There are also 278 less severe flood alerts - indicating people should prepare for possible flooding.

The agency warned that "large, slow responding rivers" - particularly the Thames, Trent and Severn - would continue to rise over the next few days.

It said the risk of groundwater flooding - when levels of water in the ground rise above surface levels - was high in some parts of the country, "notably Dorset".

'Further flooding is expected in the next 24 hours and communities across north-east England, north Wales and Northamptonshire are urged to remain especially vigilant," Paul Mustow, head of its flood incident management, said.

Continue reading the main story

Latest local news, travel and weather

The Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Sepa, has two flood warnings in place - meaning flooding is expected and immediate action is required - from Camptown to Jedburgh, and from Greenlaw to Allanton.

There are also two flood alerts - meaning flooding is possible - in both the Borders and the Edinburgh and Lothians regions.

There are none in Northern Ireland.

Holly Green, of the BBC's Weather Centre, said that while conditions were easing on Tuesday morning, there had been a few hours of persistent rainfall.

She said the rain on Tuesday would tend to become more showery in nature and it was an improving picture.

However, warnings remained in force for the first part of Tuesday morning as showers fell on already saturated surfaces.

Fairly heavy showers in some southern counties early on Tuesday brought a risk of some localised problems, she added.

Continue reading the main story

What's it like where you are?

Please send your flooding pictures by:

Email: yourpics@bbc.co.uk

Text: 61124

Upload here

Twitter: @BBC_Haveyoursay

On Monday, closures, delays and safety warnings affected dozens of A-roads, while cancellations and delays also hit some national rail services.

South-west England, where hundreds of homes were flooded at the weekend, was among a number of areas suffering considerable disruption to rail services on Monday.

On the roads, some of the worst-hit areas on Monday were in Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Shropshire.

To access more information, from your mobile, visit the BBC Weather and BBC Travel News sites.

The enhanced content on this page requires Javascript and Flash Player 9

UK forecast for 27/11/2012

Map Key

Fog

Fog Colour Range

Light

Heavy

Frost

Frost Colour Range

Light

Heavy

Rain

Rain Colour Range

Light

Heavy

Extreme

Snow

Snow Colour Range

Light

Heavy

Temperature tab only

Temperature (°C)

Temperature range chart

Send your pictures and videos to yourpics@bbc.co.uk or text them to 61124 (UK) or +44 7624 800 100 (International). If you have a large file you can upload here.

Read the terms and conditions


16.50 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger